Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Ellipsoidal Variability and the Difference between Sequence D and E Red Giants

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1002.3651 v1 pith:CIXEEIWF submitted 2010-02-19 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords sequencevelocityellipsoidalstarsvariabilityamplitudebinariescurves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We have studied a sample of Large Magellanic Cloud red giant binaries that lie on sequence E in the period--luminosity plane. We show that their combined light and velocity curves unambiguously demonstrate that they are binaries showing ellipsoidal variability. By comparing the phased light and velocity curves of both sequence D and E variables, we show that the sequence D variation -- the Long Secondary Period -- is not caused by ellipsoidal variability. We also demonstrate several further differences between stars on sequences D and E. These include differences in velocity amplitude, in the distribution of eccentricity, and in the correlations of velocity amplitude with luminosity and period. We also show that the sequence E stars, unlike stars on sequence D, do not show any evidence of a mid-infrared excess that would indicate circumstellar dust.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools