Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Row Sampling for Matrix Algorithms via a Non-Commutative Bernstein Bound

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1008.0587 v1 pith:LK2FVO6M submitted 2010-08-03 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords mathmatrixalgorithmsmatarow-samplingrowssamplinggive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We focus the use of \emph{row sampling} for approximating matrix algorithms. We give applications to matrix multipication; sparse matrix reconstruction; and, \math{\ell_2} regression. For a matrix \math{\matA\in\R^{m\times d}} which represents \math{m} points in \math{d\ll m} dimensions, all of these tasks can be achieved in \math{O(md^2)} via the singular value decomposition (SVD). For appropriate row-sampling probabilities (which typically depend on the norms of the rows of the \math{m\times d} left singular matrix of \math{\matA} (the \emph{leverage scores}), we give row-sampling algorithms with linear (up to polylog factors) dependence on the stable rank of \math{\matA}. This result is achieved through the application of non-commutative Bernstein bounds. We then give, to our knowledge, the first algorithms for computing approximations to the appropriate row-sampling probabilities without going through the SVD of \math{\matA}. Thus, these are the first \math{o(md^2)} algorithms for row-sampling based approximations to the matrix algorithms which use leverage scores as the sampling probabilities. The techniques we use to approximate sampling according to the leverage scores uses some powerful recent results in the theory of random projections for embedding, and may be of some independent interest. We confess that one may perform all these matrix tasks more efficiently using these same random projection methods, however the resulting algorithms are in terms of a small number of linear combinations of all the rows. In many applications, the actual rows of \math{\matA} have some physical meaning and so methods based on a small number of the actual rows are of interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast, Space-Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Clustering and Subspace Embeddings

    cs.DS 2025-04 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Streaming algorithms for (k,z)-clustering and Lp subspace embeddings can match offline algorithms in space and time, removing all dependence on stream length n.

  2. Approximating the Top Eigenvector in Random Order Streams

    cs.DS 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A random-order streaming algorithm approximates the top eigenvector with near-linear memory whenever the spectral gap is constant, and a lower bound shows the heavy-row parameter is unavoidable.

  3. On Socially Fair Low-Rank Approximation and Column Subset Selection

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fair low-rank approximation is NP-hard to approximate and requires exponential time under ETH; bicriteria algorithms achieve polynomial time with a rank and column count blow-up.

Pith tools