Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Minimization of Automata

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1010.5318 v3 pith:PGN4BOR3 submitted 2010-10-26 cs.FL

classification cs.FL
keywords algorithmsautomataminimizationcasefiniteminimalalgorithmanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This chapter is concerned with the design and analysis of algorithms for minimizing finite automata. Getting a minimal automaton is a fundamental issue in the use and implementation of finite automata tools in frameworks like text processing, image analysis, linguistic computer science, and many other applications. There are two main families of minimization algorithms. The first by a sequence of refinements of a partition of the set of states, the second by a sequence of fusions or merges of states. Hopcroft's and Moore's algorithms belong to the first family, the linear-time minimization of acyclic automata of Revuz belongs to the second family. One of our studies is upon the comparison of the nature of Moore's and Hopcroft's algorithms. This gives some new insight in both algorithms. As we shall see, these algorithms are quite different both in behavior and in complexity. In particular, we show that it is not possible to simulate the computations of one of the algorithm by the other. We describe the minimization algorithm by fusion for so-called local automata. A special case of minimization is the construction o minimal automata for finite sets. We consider briefly this case, and in particular describe incremental algorithms. Finally, we consider the case of updating a minimal automaton when a word is added or removed from the set it recognizes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Monitor-Based Runtime Assurance for Temporal Logic Specifications

    eess.SY 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a safety controller that combines LTL monitor automata, a backup controller, and reachable-set checks to guarantee safety properties for nondeterministic continuous-state cyber-physical systems.

Pith tools