Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Metropolising forward particle filtering backward sampling and Rao-Blackwellisation of Metropolised particle smoothers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1011.2153 v1 pith:J2U5T7FW submitted 2010-11-09 stat.CO

classification stat.CO
keywords smoothingbackwardparticledistributiondistributionsstatetrajectoryfilter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Smoothing in state-space models amounts to computing the conditional distribution of the latent state trajectory, given observations, or expectations of functionals of the state trajectory with respect to this distributions. For models that are not linear Gaussian or possess finite state space, smoothing distributions are in general infeasible to compute as they involve intergrals over a space of dimensionality at least equal to the number of observations. Recent years have seen an increased interest in Monte Carlo-based methods for smoothing, often involving particle filters. One such method is to approximate filter distributions with a particle filter, and then to simulate backwards on the trellis of particles using a backward kernel. We show that by supplementing this procedure with a Metropolis-Hastings step deciding whether to accept a proposed trajectory or not, one obtains a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme whose stationary distribution is the exact smoothing distribution. We also show that in this procedure, backward sampling can be replaced by backward smoothing, which effectively means averaging over all possible trajectories. In an example we compare these approaches to a similar one recently proposed by Andrieu, Doucet and Holenstein, and show that the new methods can be more efficient in terms of precision (inverse variance) per computation time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools