Aspectual Principle, Benford's Law and Russell's Paradox

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1012.5537 v1 pith:IDZP2RTN submitted 2010-12-23 math.CA

Victor P. Novikov This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.CA

keywords aspectualbenfordparadoxprinciplerussellarticleexplainedmeans

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

In the present article Benford's law and Russell's paradox are explained by means of Aspectual Principle

Forward citations

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Paradoxes Are Not Contradictions: Re-examining the Third Mathematical Crisis
math.LO 2026-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

The paper claims paradoxes are legitimate logical structures rather than contradictions, and concludes Turing's halting problem proof is flawed.