Submodular meets Spectral: Greedy Algorithms for Subset Selection, Sparse Approximation and Dictionary Selection
read the original abstract
We study the problem of selecting a subset of k random variables from a large set, in order to obtain the best linear prediction of another variable of interest. This problem can be viewed in the context of both feature selection and sparse approximation. We analyze the performance of widely used greedy heuristics, using insights from the maximization of submodular functions and spectral analysis. We introduce the submodularity ratio as a key quantity to help understand why greedy algorithms perform well even when the variables are highly correlated. Using our techniques, we obtain the strongest known approximation guarantees for this problem, both in terms of the submodularity ratio and the smallest k-sparse eigenvalue of the covariance matrix. We further demonstrate the wide applicability of our techniques by analyzing greedy algorithms for the dictionary selection problem, and significantly improve the previously known guarantees. Our theoretical analysis is complemented by experiments on real-world and synthetic data sets; the experiments show that the submodularity ratio is a stronger predictor of the performance of greedy algorithms than other spectral parameters.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Is Data Shapley Not Better than Random in Data Selection? Ask NASH
NASH improves Shapley-based data selection by decomposing the utility function into Shapley-informative components and aggregating them non-linearly.
-
Is Data Shapley Not Better than Random in Data Selection? Ask NASH
NASH decomposes the validation utility into Shapley-informative component functions and aggregates them non-linearly to make Data Shapley-based data selection consistently effective.
-
Pareto Optimization with Robust Evaluation for Noisy Subset Selection
PORE applies Pareto optimization with a robust evaluation function to noisy subset selection under cardinality constraints, outperforming greedy, POSS, and PONSS on real-world datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.