Comments on Kormendy, Bender & Cornell (2011, Nature, 469, 374)

Alister W. Graham

REVIEW

Comments on Kormendy, Bender & Cornell (2011, Nature, 469, 374)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1103.0525 v1 pith:XTK3V55L submitted 2011-03-01 astro-ph.CO

Alister W. Graham This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.CO

keywords naturearticlebendercommentscornellkormendyprovidedanalysis

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

Comments on Kormendy, Bender & Cornell's (2011, Nature, 469, 374) article "Supermassive black holes do not correlate with galaxy disks or pseudobulges" are provided. A number of scientific concerns regarding the data analysis and conclusions are discussed. A broader historical perspective - difficult for authors to supply within the confines of a Nature article - is also provided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools