Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Randomized algorithms for matrices and data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1104.5557 v3 pith:NX6VEECZ submitted 2011-04-29 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords algorithmsrandomizedmatrixdataproblemslarge-scalenumericalrecent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomized algorithms for very large matrix problems have received a great deal of attention in recent years. Much of this work was motivated by problems in large-scale data analysis, and this work was performed by individuals from many different research communities. This monograph will provide a detailed overview of recent work on the theory of randomized matrix algorithms as well as the application of those ideas to the solution of practical problems in large-scale data analysis. An emphasis will be placed on a few simple core ideas that underlie not only recent theoretical advances but also the usefulness of these tools in large-scale data applications. Crucial in this context is the connection with the concept of statistical leverage. This concept has long been used in statistical regression diagnostics to identify outliers; and it has recently proved crucial in the development of improved worst-case matrix algorithms that are also amenable to high-quality numerical implementation and that are useful to domain scientists. Randomized methods solve problems such as the linear least-squares problem and the low-rank matrix approximation problem by constructing and operating on a randomized sketch of the input matrix. Depending on the specifics of the situation, when compared with the best previously-existing deterministic algorithms, the resulting randomized algorithms have worst-case running time that is asymptotically faster; their numerical implementations are faster in terms of clock-time; or they can be implemented in parallel computing environments where existing numerical algorithms fail to run at all. Numerous examples illustrating these observations will be described in detail.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superfast 1-Norm Estimation

    math.NA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Randomized sparsification of the vectors in LAPACK's 1-norm estimator produces sublinear-cost estimates whose mean errors are small on the paper's test suite.

  2. Bayesian Data Sketching for Varying Coefficient Regression Models

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Random data sketching lets Bayesian varying coefficient regression run on compressed data with posterior contraction and nearly equivalent predictive performance to the uncompressed model.

Pith tools