Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1105.4502 v2 pith:CGQMZBTB submitted 2011-05-23 cs.SI physics.soc-phq-bio.PE

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-phq-bio.PE
keywords sentimentsonlinesocialusersdiseasehealthmediavaccine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is great interest in the dynamics of health behaviors in social networks and how they affect collective public health outcomes, but measuring population health behaviors over time and space requires substantial resources. Here, we use publicly available data from 101,853 users of online social media collected over a time period of almost six months to measure the spatio-temporal sentiment towards a new vaccine. We validated our approach by identifying a strong correlation between sentiments expressed online and CDC- estimated vaccination rates by region. Analysis of the network of opinionated users showed that information flows more often between users who share the same sentiments - and less often between users who do not share the same sentiments - than expected by chance alone. We also found that most communities are dominated by either positive or negative sentiments towards the novel vaccine. Simulations of infectious disease transmission show that if clusters of negative vaccine sentiments lead to clusters of unprotected individuals, the likelihood of disease outbreaks are greatly increased. Online social media provide unprecedented access to data allowing for inexpensive and efficient tools to identify target areas for intervention efforts and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools