Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Common envelope: the progress and the pitfalls

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1108.1226 v1 pith:QBBHHFYU submitted 2011-08-04 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords envelopecommonprogressyearsenergyobservationsphaseproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The common envelope event is one of the most important and uncertain evolutionary stages that lead to formation of compact binaries. While the problem is almost 30 years old, its theoretical foundation did not progress much from the first proposed consideration. For many years, the simple estimate provided by \alpha \lambda-formalism has been intensively used by population synthesis studies and, not surprisingly, frequently contradicted observations. In recent years, the advancements in our studies of stellar structure, progress of the numerical techniques for hydrodynamical simulations as well as increase of the computer power and new observations started to bring improvements to our understanding of the common envelope phase. We review main physical processes taking place during the common envelope phase from the theoretical point of view and how they affect the values of classical formal parameters. In particular, we discuss the energy budget problem -- what are the energy sources, sinks and what is the condition for the envelope to disperse, as well as the importance of choosing the definition of the remnant core to the common envelope outcome.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Progenitor Systems of Classical Novae in M31

    astro-ph.SR 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First observational delay time distribution for classical novae in M31, with detections at stellar ages of 2-3.2 Gyr and 7.9-14.1 Gyr.

Pith tools