Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Why variable AGB stars with Long Secondary Periods aren't binaries, but are dusty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1201.1046 v1 pith:W2PZZZ5E submitted 2012-01-05 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords starslspslongsecondarybinaritycurvesdiskdust
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Roughly 30% of variable AGB stars show a Long Secondary Period, or LSP. These LSPs have posed something of a problem in recent years and their cause remains a mystery. By combining VLT-derived velocity curves with MACHO and OGLE light curves we were able to examine many properties of these stars and test the theory that LSPs are caused by binarity. We show why we concluded that the binary model for LSPs is unlikely. Examining mid-infrared SAGE observations for stars with LSPs shows that these stars are surrounded by a significant amount of cool dust in a nonspherical distribution, e.g. a disk or clumps. The unlikeliness of binarity in these stars forces us to conclude that the dust is not in a disk. We are left without an acceptable explanation for Long Secondary Periods in AGB stars.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools