Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anatomy of the giant component: The strictly supercritical regime

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1202.6112 v1 pith:UQPH7MXH submitted 2012-02-28 math.CO math.PR

classification math.COmath.PR
keywords componentgiantepsilonrandomarrivecontiguousdescriptionlambda
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In a recent work of the authors and Kim, we derived a complete description of the largest component of the Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph $G(n,p)$ as it emerges from the critical window, i.e. for $p = (1+\epsilon)/n$ where $\epsilon^3 n \to\infty$ and $\epsilon=o(1)$, in terms of a tractable contiguous model. Here we provide the analogous description for the supercritical giant component, i.e., the largest component of $G(n,p)$ for $p = \lambda/n$ where $\lambda>1$ is fixed. The contiguous model is roughly as follows: Take a random degree sequence and sample a random multigraph with these degrees to arrive at the kernel; Replace the edges by paths whose lengths are i.i.d. geometric variables to arrive at the 2-core; Attach i.i.d. Poisson Galton-Watson trees to the vertices for the final giant component. As in the case of the emerging giant, we obtain this result via a sequence of contiguity arguments at the heart of which are Kim's Poisson-cloning method and the Pittel-Wormald local limit theorems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Meeting and coalescence times for random walks in the largest component of the Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Expected meeting, coalescence, and voter-consensus times on the Erdős–Rényi giant are Θ(n) throughout the fixed-supercritical, slightly-supercritical, and critical regimes.

Pith tools