Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dipole matrix element approach vs. Peierls approximation for optical conductivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1203.5711 v2 pith:UQ7UWLTP submitted 2012-03-26 cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords opticalapproximationpeierlsconductivitytransitionsapproachdipoleelement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a computational approach for calculating the optical conductivity in the augmented plane wave basis set of Wien2K and apply it for thoroughly comparing the full dipole matrix element calculation and the Peierls approximation. The results for SrVO3 and V2O3 show that the Peierls approximation, which is commonly used in model calculations, works well for optical transitions between the d orbitals. In a typical transition metal oxide, these transitions are solely responsible for the optical conductivity at low frequencies. The Peierls approximation does not work, on the other hand, for optical transitions between p- and d-orbitals which usually became important at frequencies of a few eVs

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools