Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Hubble parameter measurement constraints on the cosmological deceleration-acceleration transition redshift

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1301.5243 v1 pith:GGBZO5YY submitted 2013-01-22 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalhubblemeasurementsredshiftsconstantconstraintsdeceleration-accelerationmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We compile a list of 28 independent measurements of the Hubble parameter between redshifts 0.07 < z < 2.3 and use this to place constraints on model parameters of constant and time-evolving dark energy cosmologies. These H(z) measurements by themselves require a currently accelerating cosmological expansion at about, or better than, 3-sigma confidence. The mean and standard deviation of the 6 best-fit model deceleration-acceleration transition redshifts (for the 3 cosmological models and 2 Hubble constant priors we consider) is $z_{\rm da} = 0.74 \pm 0.05$, in good agreement with the recent Busca et al. (2012) determination of $z_{\rm da} = 0.82 \pm 0.08$ based on 11 H(z) measurements between redshifts 0.2 < z < 2.3, almost entirely from BAO-like data.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do we really need alternatives to the $\omega_0\omega_a$CDM parameterization after the DESI DR2?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a common physically motivated pivot basis, the standard CPL parameterization is mildly preferred over the fafbCDM density expansion and reproduces quintessence backgrounds at least as well.

  2. New Agegraphic Dark Energy Driven Reconstruction of \boldmath{$f(Q)$} Gravity and its Cosmological Implications

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An f(Q) gravity function is derived by forcing its dark energy density to match New Agegraphic Dark Energy, and this NADE-equal-f(Q) model fits BAO data only marginally better than the standard model.

  3. Transit dark energy cosmological models in generalized matter-geometry coupling theory using a non-linear form of $f(R,T,L_{m})$ function

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A modified f(R,T,L_m) gravity model, fitted to CC and Pantheon data, yields an accelerating late-time universe with transition redshift near 0.6 and an effective dark energy equation of state within 1e-5 of -1.

Pith tools