Structural Intervention Distance (SID) for Evaluating Causal Graphs
read the original abstract
Causal inference relies on the structure of a graph, often a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Different graphs may result in different causal inference statements and different intervention distributions. To quantify such differences, we propose a (pre-) distance between DAGs, the structural intervention distance (SID). The SID is based on a graphical criterion only and quantifies the closeness between two DAGs in terms of their corresponding causal inference statements. It is therefore well-suited for evaluating graphs that are used for computing interventions. Instead of DAGs it is also possible to compare CPDAGs, completed partially directed acyclic graphs that represent Markov equivalence classes. Since it differs significantly from the popular Structural Hamming Distance (SHD), the SID constitutes a valuable additional measure. We discuss properties of this distance and provide an efficient implementation with software code available on the first author's homepage (an R package is under construction).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Synthetic but Not Realistic: The Evaluation Challenge in Generative Modelling for Structured Electronic Medical Records
Generative models for synthetic EMRs match marginal distributions but fail to preserve subgroup structure, effect estimates, and dependency structure simultaneously on the PRIME-CVD cohort.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.