Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the methods to determine signal attenuation curve for different surface arrays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1310.0330 v1 pith:GDMTQJRU submitted 2013-10-01 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords attenuationcurvearrayssurfacecarlocomponentscompositiondifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large surface arrays of current cosmic ray experiments measure the signals of electromagnetic or muonic components or their combination. The correction to the zenith angle (the attenuation curve) has to be taken into account before the signal is converted to the shower energy. Either Monte Carlo simulations or indirect estimation using collected data (Constant Intensity Cut method) can be used. However, the assumptions of composition or isotropy used for the determination of the attenuation curve can still influence the final physics results such as the energy spectrum, or modify anisotropy searches and composition analysis. Using simplified Toy Monte Carlo with an output from CORSIKA simulations we try to find several examples of what kind of effects can be caused by the methods of inferring the attenuation curve. Surface arrays of different sensitivities to electromagnetic and muonic components were considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools