Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Review of the Use of Electroencephalography as an Evaluation Method for Human-Computer Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1311.2222 v1 pith:3UGS4IBX submitted 2013-11-09 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords evaluationattentionelectroencephalographyemotionserrorhuman-computerinteractionneuroimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating human-computer interaction is essential as a broadening population uses machines, sometimes in sensitive contexts. However, traditional evaluation methods may fail to combine real-time measures, an "objective" approach and data contextualization. In this review we look at how adding neuroimaging techniques can respond to such needs. We focus on electroencephalography (EEG), as it could be handled effectively during a dedicated evaluation phase. We identify workload, attention, vigilance, fatigue, error recognition, emotions, engagement, flow and immersion as being recognizable by EEG. We find that workload, attention and emotions assessments would benefit the most from EEG. Moreover, we advocate to study further error recognition through neuroimaging to enhance usability and increase user experience.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FDC-Net: Rethinking the association between EEG artifact removal and multi-dimensional affective computing

    cs.HC 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    FDC-Net is claimed to jointly perform EEG artifact removal and emotion recognition with state-of-the-art accuracy, but the manuscript body is a completely different paper on chiral metamaterials.

Pith tools