Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Likelihood reweighting methods to reduce potential bias in noninferiority trials which rely on historical data to make inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1311.7485 v1 pith:AJV6BNRP submitted 2013-11-29 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords trialsbiascontrolledeffectnoninferioritypopulationactivedifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is generally believed that bias is minimized in well-controlled randomized clinical trials. However, bias can arise in active controlled noninferiority trials because the inference relies on a previously estimated effect size obtained from a historical trial that may have been conducted for a different population. By implementing a likelihood reweighting method through propensity scoring, a study designed to estimate a treatment effect in one trial population can be used to estimate the treatment effect size in a different target population. We illustrate this method in active controlled noninferiority trials, although it can also be used in other types of studies, such as historically controlled trials, meta-analyses, and comparative effectiveness analyses.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools