REVIEW 4 cited by
Scale setting in lattice QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The principles of scale setting in lattice QCD as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various commonly used scales are discussed. After listing criteria for good scales, I concentrate on the main presently used ones with an emphasis on scales derived from the Yang-Mills gradient flow. For these I discuss discretisation errors, statistical precision and mass effects. A short review on numerical results also brings me to an unpleasant disagreement which remains to be explained.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Lattice study of spin interactions between heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma
The spin-dependent heavy-quark potential in the quark-gluon plasma is complex, with a channel-dependent imaginary part first extracted from lattice QCD.
-
Lattice QCD Study of Anomalous Transport Phenomena in Strongly Interacting Matter
First physical-point lattice QCD calculation of the Chiral Separation Effect conductivity, a zero equilibrium Chiral Magnetic Effect with conserved currents, and a localized equilibrium CME in inhomogeneous fields.
-
Staggered fermions with taste splitting mass term on dynamical configurations
Preliminary Nf=2 dynamical simulations of single-taste staggered fermions find negligible rotational-symmetry counterterms and a computable but still-too-heavy pion mass on volumes up to 16^4.
-
The order of the chiral phase transition in massless many-flavour lattice QCD
Lattice QCD simulations with up to seven flavors indicate that the first-order chiral transition seen on coarse lattices is a cutoff artifact, so the continuum chiral transition is second-order for all flavors up to t...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.