pith. sign in

arxiv: 1401.6951 · v5 · pith:V5SKQDHXnew · submitted 2014-01-27 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · cs.DL

Inequality in Societies, Academic Institutions and Science Journals: Gini and k-indices

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph cs.DL
keywords indexinequalityacrossincomeinstitutionsjournalsscienceworld
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:V5SKQDHX Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{V5SKQDHX}

Prints a linked pith:V5SKQDHX badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Social inequality is traditionally measured by the Gini-index ($g$). The $g$-index takes values from $0$ to $1$ where $g=0$ represents complete equality and $g=1$ represents complete inequality. Most of the estimates of the income or wealth data indicate the $g$ value to be widely dispersed across the countries of the world: \textit{g} values typically range from $0.30$ to $0.65$ at a particular time (year). We estimated similarly the Gini-index for the citations earned by the yearly publications of various academic institutions and the science journals. The ISI web of science data suggests remarkably strong inequality and universality ($g=0.70\pm0.07$) across all the universities and institutions of the world, while for the journals we find $g=0.65\pm0.15$ for any typical year. We define a new inequality measure, namely the $k$-index, saying that the cumulative income or citations of ($1-k$) fraction of people or papers exceed those earned by the fraction ($k$) of the people or publications respectively. We find, while the $k$-index value for income ranges from $0.60$ to $0.75$ for income distributions across the world, it has a value around $0.75\pm0.05$ for different universities and institutions across the world and around $0.77\pm0.10$ for the science journals. Apart from above indices, we also analyze the same institution and journal citation data by measuring Pietra index and median index.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Formalization of the generalized Pareto principle and structural typicality of the 20/80-rule

    physics.soc-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A formalization of the generalized Pareto principle derives that exponential and normal distributions with 100 to 100,000 samples produce p values near 0.2, close to the 80/20 rule and below prior saturation conjectures.