Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

R Markdown: Integrating A Reproducible Analysis Tool into Introductory Statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1402.1894 v1 pith:DNXUQV5Q submitted 2014-02-08 stat.OT

classification stat.OT
keywords statisticalanalysisintroductorymarkdownstatisticsabilitybecomedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Nolan and Temple Lang argue that "the ability to express statistical computations is an essential skill." A key related capacity is the ability to conduct and present data analysis in a way that another person can understand and replicate. The copy-and-paste workflow that is an artifact of antiquated user-interface design makes reproducibility of statistical analysis more difficult, especially as data become increasingly complex and statistical methods become increasingly sophisticated. R Markdown is a new technology that makes creating fully-reproducible statistical analysis simple and painless. It provides a solution suitable not only for cutting edge research, but also for use in an introductory statistics course. We present evidence that R Markdown can be used effectively in introductory statistics courses, and discuss its role in the rapidly-changing world of statistical computation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cracking the Code: Evaluating Zero-Shot Prompting Methods for Providing Programming Feedback

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a small case study, step-by-step prompts reduced irrelevant suggestions in LLM feedback on R errors, while prompts that did not explicitly list data sources improved error identification.

Pith tools