pith. sign in

arxiv: 1402.3204 · v2 · pith:RBTKIRYVnew · submitted 2014-02-13 · 🧮 math.AG

Mapping stacks and categorical notions of properness

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords algebraicstacksproperstackpropernessexamplesformallygeometry
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

One fundamental consequence of a scheme $X$ being proper is that the functor classifying maps from $X$ to any other suitably nice scheme or algebraic stack is representable by an algebraic stack. This result has been generalized by replacing $X$ with a proper algebraic stack. We show, however, that it also holds when $X$ is replaced by many examples of algebraic stacks which are not proper, including many global quotient stacks. This leads us to revisit the definition of properness for stacks. We introduce the notion of a formally proper morphism of stacks and study its properties. We develop methods for establishing formal properness in a large class of examples. Along the way, we prove strong h-descent results which hold in the setting of derived algebraic geometry but not in classical algebraic geometry. Our main applications are algebraicity results for mapping stacks and the stack of coherent sheaves on a flat and formally proper stack.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Filtered formal groups, Cartier duality, and derived algebraic geometry

    math.AG 2021-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces filtered formal groups and Cartier duality, proves a G_m-equivariant degeneration via normal cone construction, establishes unicity of complete filtrations, recovers the MRT19 filtration, and studies lifts ...