Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

New measures for evaluating creativity in scientific publications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1406.7582 v1 pith:KNYS4YVD submitted 2014-06-30 cs.SI cs.DLphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIcs.DLphysics.soc-ph
keywords publicationscientificcitationsgroupsnumberreferencescitinglarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal of our research is to understand how ideas propagate, combine and are created in large social networks. In this work, we look at a sample of relevant scientific publications in the area of high-frequency analog circuit design and their citation distribution. A novel aspect of our work is the way in which we categorize citations based on the reason and place of it in a publication. We created seven citation categories from general domain references, references to specific methods used in the same domain problem, references to an analysis method, references for experimental comparison and so on. This added information allows us to define two new measures to characterize the creativity (novelty and usefulness) of a publication based on its pattern of citations clustered by reason, place and citing scientific group. We analyzed 30 publications in relevant journals since 2000 and their about 300 citations, all in the area of high-frequency analog circuit design. We observed that the number of citations a publication receives from different scientific groups matches a Levy type distribution: with a large number of groups citing a publication relatively few times, and a very small number of groups citing a publication a large number of times. We looked at the motifs a publication is cited differently by different scientific groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Data

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors built HypoGen, 5,478 Bit-Flip-Spark hypothesis triples with reasoning chains from NeurIPS 2023 and ICLR 2024 papers, and fine-tuned LLaMA models on it, reporting higher feasibility but lower diversity in g...

Pith tools