Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Angular clustering of z~2 star-forming and passive galaxies in 2.5 square degrees of deep CFHT imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.2319 v1 pith:ISS7KB3M submitted 2014-07-09 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords galaxiesclusteringfindpassiveangularcfhtdeepfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the angular clustering of z~2 galaxies using ~40,000 star-forming (SF) and ~5,000 passively-evolving (PE) galaxies selected from ~2.5 deg$^2$ of deep ($K_{lim}$=23-24 AB) CFHT imaging. For both populations the clustering is stronger for galaxies brighter in rest-frame optical and the trend is particularly strong for PE galaxies, indicating that passive galaxies with larger stellar masses reside in more massive halos. In contrast, at rest-frame UV we find that while the clustering of SF galaxies increases with increasing luminosity, it decreases for PE galaxies; a possible explanation lies in quenching of star formation in the most massive halos. Furthermore, we find two components in the correlation functions for both SF and PE galaxies, attributable to one- and two-halo terms. The presence of one-halo terms for both PE and SF galaxies suggests that environmental effects were producing passive galaxies in virtualized environments already by z~2. Finally, we find notable clustering differences between the four widely-separated fields in our study; the popular COSMOS field is the most discrepant (as is also the case for number counts and luminosity functions), highlighting the need for very large areas and multiple sightlines in galaxy evolution statistical studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools