Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Incorporation of Sparsity Information in Large-scale Multiple Two-sample $t$ Tests

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1410.4282 v1 pith:JZPFRIWP submitted 2014-10-16 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords proceduretestingcontroldatascreeningstatisticsstudenttwo-sample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large-scale multiple two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ testing problems often arise from the statistical analysis of scientific data. To detect components with different values between two mean vectors, a well-known procedure is to apply the Benjamini and Hochberg (B-H) method and two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics to control the false discovery rate (FDR). In many applications, mean vectors are expected to be sparse or asymptotically sparse. When dealing with such type of data, {\em can we gain more power than the standard procedure such as the B-H method with Student's $t$ statistics while keeping the FDR under control?} The answer is positive. By exploiting the possible sparsity information in mean vectors, we present an uncorrelated screening-based (US) FDR control procedure, which is shown to be more powerful than the B-H method. The US testing procedure depends on a novel construction of screening statistics, which are asymptotically uncorrelated with two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics. The US testing procedure is different from some existing {\em testing following screening} methods (Reiner, et al., 2007; Yekutieli, 2008) in which independence between screening and testing is crucial to control the FDR, while the independence often requires additional data or splitting of samples. An inappropriate splitting of samples may result in a loss rather than an improvement of statistical power. Instead, the uncorrelated screening US is based on the original data and does not need to split the samples. Theoretical results show that the US testing procedure controls the desired FDR asymptotically. Numerical studies are conducted and indicate that the proposed procedure works quite well.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. False Discovery Control in Multiple Testing: A Brief Overview of Theories and Methodologies

    stat.ME 2024-11 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    This is a survey of false discovery rate control methods, organized into ranking, FDP estimation, and thresholding steps.

Pith tools