Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Variable Selection for Modeling the Absolute Magnitude at Maximum of Type Ia Supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.01470 v1 pith:KPF3Q24S submitted 2015-04-07 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords variablesorderabsoluteerrormagnitudegeneralizationlight-curvemaximum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We discuss what is an appropriate set of explanatory variables in order to predict the absolute magnitude at the maximum of Type Ia supernovae. In order to have a good prediction, the error for future data, which is called the "generalization error," should be small. We use cross-validation in order to control the generalization error and LASSO-type estimator in order to choose the set of variables. This approach can be used even in the case that the number of samples is smaller than the number of candidate variables. We studied the Berkeley supernova database with our approach. Candidates of the explanatory variables include normalized spectral data, variables about lines, and previously proposed flux-ratios, as well as the color and light-curve widths. As a result, we confirmed the past understanding about Type Ia supernova: i) The absolute magnitude at maximum depends on the color and light-curve width. ii) The light-curve width depends on the strength of Si II. Recent studies have suggested to add more variables in order to explain the absolute magnitude. However, our analysis does not support to add any other variables in order to have a better generalization error.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools