Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Connected components of meanders: I. Bi-rainbow meanders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.03099 v1 pith:GX7LJLNI submitted 2015-04-13 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords meandersbi-rainbownumbercomponentsconnectedcurvesfamiliesclosed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Closed meanders are planar configurations of one or several disjoint closed Jordan curves intersecting a given line or curve transversely. They arise as shooting curves of parabolic PDEs in one space dimension, as trajectories of Cartesian billiards, and as representations of elements of Temperley-Lieb algebras. Given the configuration of intersections, for example as a permutation or an arc collection, the number of Jordan curves is unknown and needs to be determined. We address this question in the special case of bi-rainbow meanders, which are given as non-branched families (rainbows) of nested arcs. Easily obtainable results for small bi-rainbow meanders containing up to four families suggest an expression of the number of curves by the greatest common divisor (gcd) of polynomials in the sizes of the rainbow families. We prove however, that this is not the case. In fact, the number of connected components of bi-rainbow meanders with more than four families cannot be expressed as the gcd of polynomials in the sizes of the rainbows. On the other hand, we provide a complexity analysis of nose-retraction algorithms. They determine the number of connected components of arbitrary bi-rainbow meanders in logarithmic time. In fact, the nose-retraction algorithms resemble the Euclidean algorithm, which is used to determine the gcd, in structure and complexity. Looking for a closed formula of the number of connected components, the nose-retraction algorithm is as good as a gcd-formula and therefore as good as we can possibly expect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combinatorial index formulas for Lie algebras of seaweed type

    math.RA 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The index of a type-D seaweed algebra is computed by counting meander components against a 'tail' set of vertices, yielding gcd-based closed forms and a Frobenius classification.

Pith tools