REVIEW 2 cited by
Malthusian Locks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Applications running in modern multithreaded environments are sometimes \emph{over-threaded}. The excess threads do not improve performance, and in fact may act to degrade performance via \emph{scalability collapse}. Often, such software also has highly contended locks. We opportunistically leverage the existence of such locks by modifying the lock admission policy so as to intentionally limit the number of threads circulating over the lock in a given period. Specifically, if there are more threads circulating than are necessary to keep the lock saturated, our approach will selectively cull and passivate some of those threads. We borrow the concept of \emph{swapping} from the field of memory management and intentionally impose \emph{concurrency restriction} (CR) if a lock is oversubscribed. In the worst case CR does no harm, but it often yields performance benefits. The resultant admission order is unfair over the short term but we explicitly provide long-term fairness by periodically shifting threads between the set of passivated threads and those actively circulating. Our approach is palliative, but often effective.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reciprocating Locks
Reciprocating Locks is a new spin lock that combines an arrival stack, detached entry segments, and per-thread TLS wait elements to provide constant-time paths, local spinning, and bounded bypass.
-
Semaphores Augmented with a Waiting Array
A ticket-based semaphore augmented with a waiting array, TWA-Semaphore, preserves FIFO admission while improving throughput over plain ticket semaphores in a microbenchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.