Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Key drivers of EU budget allocation: Does power matter?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.01267 v1 pith:E3ZFZDPR submitted 2015-12-02 q-fin.EC q-fin.EC

classification q-fin.EC
keywords budgetpowerallocationalternativedifferentindexnucleoluspolitical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine the determinants of the EU budget expenditures allocation among different countries. In line with earlier literature, we consider two alternative explanations for the EU budget distribution: political power vs. needs view. Extending the original data set from Kauppi and Widgr\'en (2004), we analyze the robustness of their predictions when applying a different measure of power and more sophisticated econometric techniques. We conclude that the nucleolus is a good alternative to the Shapley-Shubik index in distributive situations such as the case of EU budget allocation. Our results also show that when explaining budget shares, the relative weight of political power based on the nucleolus is lower than the predictions of previous studies based on the Shapley-Shubik index.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools