Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Polynomial bounds for decoupling, with applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.01603 v1 pith:CN5DJARA submitted 2015-12-05 cs.DM math.PR

classification cs.DMmath.PR
keywords decouplingfullknownobtainpolynomialprodwhenaaronson
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Let f(x) = f(x_1, ..., x_n) = \sum_{|S| <= k} a_S \prod_{i \in S} x_i be an n-variate real multilinear polynomial of degree at most k, where S \subseteq [n] = {1, 2, ..., n}. For its "one-block decoupled" version, f~(y,z) = \sum_{|S| <= k} a_S \sum_{i \in S} y_i \prod_{j \in S\i} z_j, we show tail-bound comparisons of the form Pr[|f~(y,z)| > C_k t] <= D_k Pr[f(x) > t]. Our constants C_k, D_k are significantly better than those known for "full decoupling". For example, when x, y, z are independent Gaussians we obtain C_k = D_k = O(k); when x, y, z, Rademacher random variables we obtain C_k = O(k^2), D_k = k^{O(k)}. By contrast, for full decoupling only C_k = D_k = k^{O(k)} is known in these settings. We describe consequences of these results for query complexity (related to conjectures of Aaronson and Ambainis) and for analysis of Boolean functions (including an optimal sharpening of the DFKO Inequality).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QMA vs. QCMA and Pseudorandomness

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Assuming a quantum pseudorandomness conjecture for dense permutation distributions, there exists a classical oracle relative to which QMA differs from QCMA.

Pith tools