Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multiplication in Sobolev Spaces, Revisited

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.07379 v3 pith:QQ5H2BI7 submitted 2015-12-23 math.AP

classification math.AP
keywords spacesmultiplicationtheoremsresultssobolev-slobodeckijzolesioarticlebounded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this article, we re-examine some of the classical pointwise multiplication theorems in Sobolev-Slobodeckij spaces, in part motivated by a simple counter-example that illustrates how certain multiplication theorems fail in Sobolev-Slobodeckij spaces when a bounded domain is replaced by Rn. We identify the source of the failure, and examine why the same failure is not encountered in Bessel potential spaces. To analyze the situation, we begin with a survey of the classical multiplication results stated and proved in the 1977 article of Zolesio, and carefully distinguish between the case of spaces defined on the all of Rn and spaces defined on a bounded domain (with e.g. a Lipschitz boundary). However, the survey we give has a few new wrinkles; the proofs we include are based almost exclusively on interpolation theory rather than Littlewood-Paley theory and Besov spaces, and some of the results we give and their proofs, including the results for negative exponents, do not appear in the literature in this form. We also include a particularly important variation of one of the multiplication theorems that is relevant to the study of nonlinear PDE systems arising in general relativity and other areas. The conditions for multiplication to be continuous in the case of Sobolev-Slobodeckij spaces are somewhat subtle and intertwined, and as a result, the multiplication theorems of Zolesio in 1977 have been cited (more than once) in the standard literature in slightly more generality than what is actually proved by Zolesio, and in cases that allow for the construction of counter-examples such as the one included here.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An inverse problem for the fractional Schr\"odinger equation in a magnetic field

    math.AP 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the fractional magnetic Schrödinger equation uniquely determines the magnetic and electric potentials up to a natural gauge.

  2. Spatial Sobolev regularity for stochastic Burgers equations with additive trace class noise

    math.PR 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stochastic Burgers solutions with additive trace class noise are shown to exist uniquely in Sobolev spaces H^gamma for all gamma < min{1, 1/2+beta}.

  3. Detecting screens modeled by Schr\"odinger operators that generate $C_0$ contraction semigroups

    math-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Every C0 contraction semigroup extending a Schrödinger Hamiltonian is generated by a linear absorbing boundary condition, and each carries an explicit Born rule for detection times.

Pith tools