REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraining higher-order parameters for primordial non-Gaussianities from power spectra and bispectra of imaging survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We investigate the statistical power of higher-order statistics and cross-correlation statistics to constrain the primordial non-Gaussianity from the imaging surveys. In particular, we consider the local-type primordial non- Gaussianity and discuss how well one can tightly constrain the higher-order non-Gaussian parameters ($g_{\rm NL}$ and $\tau_{\rm NL}$) as well as the leading order parameter $f_{\rm NL}$ from the halo/galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing measurements. Making use of a strong scale-dependent behavior in the galaxy/halo clustering, Fisher matrix analysis reveals that the bispectra can break the degeneracy between non-Gaussian parameters ($f_{\rm NL}$, $g_{\rm NL}$ and $\tau_{\rm NL}$) and this will give simultaneous constraints on those three parameters. The combination of cross-correlation statistics further improves the constraints by factor of 2. As a result, upcoming imaging surveys like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope have the potential to improve the constraints on the primordial non-Gaussianity much tighter than those obtained from the CMB measurement by Planck, giving us an opportunity to test the single-sourced consistency relation, $\tau_{\rm NL} \ge (36/25) f_{\rm NL}^2$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Redshift space distortions in the presence of non-minimally coupled dark matter
In dark matter-dark energy coupling models, the Kaiser formula gains a coupling-dependent term, so redshift-space distortions measure an effective growth rate that differs from the true matter growth rate, with Euclid...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.