Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Different numerical estimators for main effect global sensitivity indices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.00770 v1 pith:FNGHRN7O submitted 2016-06-02 math.NA cs.NAstat.OT

classification math.NAcs.NAstat.OT
keywords indicessensitivitydifferentformulassobolapproachcompareddirect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The variance-based method of global sensitivity indices based on Sobol sensitivity indices became very popular among practitioners due to its easiness of interpretation. For complex practical problems computation of Sobol indices generally requires a large number of function evaluations to achieve reasonable convergence. Four different direct formulas for computing Sobol main effect sensitivity indices are compared on a set of test problems for which there are analytical results. These formulas are based on high-dimensional integrals which are evaluated using MC and QMC techniques. Direct formulas are also compared with a different approach based on the so-called double loop reordering formula. It is found that the double loop reordering (DLR) approach shows a superior performance among all methods both for models with independent and dependent variables.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools