REVIEW 2 cited by
Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Bots are social media accounts that automate interaction with other users, and they are active on the StrongerIn-Brexit conversation happening over Twitter. These automated scripts generate content through these platforms and then interact with people. Political bots are automated accounts that are particularly active on public policy issues, elections, and political crises. In this preliminary study on the use of political bots during the UK referendum on EU membership, we analyze the tweeting patterns for both human users and bots. We find that political bots have a small but strategic role in the referendum conversations: (1) the family of hashtags associated with the argument for leaving the EU dominates, (2) different perspectives on the issue utilize different levels of automation, and (3) less than 1 percent of sampled accounts generate almost a third of all the messages.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
KI4Demokratie: An AI-Based Platform for Monitoring and Fostering Democratic Discourse
An integrated AI dashboard for monitoring German right-wing discourse is presented, with a preliminary evaluation of hate speech and sentiment models on 100 German-language posts.
-
Public Discourse Sandbox: Facilitating Human and AI Digital Communication Research
The Public Discourse Sandbox is a Django-based research platform with human-AI and AI-AI accounts, IRB-based experiment management, and open-source deployment.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.