Recognition: unknown
Detection of Prominent Stellar Disks in the Progenitors of Present-day Massive Elliptical Galaxies
read the original abstract
Massive galaxies at higher redshifts ($\emph{z}$ $>$ 2) show different characteristics from their local counterparts: They are compact and most likely have a disk. In this study, we trace the evolution of local massive galaxies by performing a detailed morphological analysis, namely, fitting single S\'{e}rsic profiles and performing bulge+disk decompositions. We analyze $\sim$ 250 massive galaxies selected from all CANDELS fields (COSMOS, UDS, EGS, GOODS-South and GOODS-North). We confirm that both star-forming and quiescent galaxies increase their sizes significantly from $\emph{z}$ $\approx$ 2.5 to the present day. The global S\'{e}rsic index of quiescent galaxies increases over time (from $n$ $\approx$ 2.5 to $n$ $>$ 4), while that of star-forming galaxies remains roughly constant ($n$ $\approx$ 2.5). By decomposing galaxy profiles into bulge+disk components, we find that massive galaxies at high redshift have prominent stellar disks, which are also evident from visual inspection of the images. By $z$ $\approx$ 0.5, the majority of the disks disappear and massive quiescent galaxies begin to resemble the local elliptical galaxies. Star-forming galaxies have lower bulge-to-total ratios ($B/T$) than their quiescent counterparts at each redshift bin. The bulges of star-forming and quiescent galaxies follow different evolutionary histories, while their disks evolve similarly. We conclude that major mergers, along with minor mergers, have played a crucial role in the significant size increase of high-\emph{z} galaxies and the destruction of their massive and large-scale disks.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CSST Preparations: Galaxy Completeness and S\'ersic Profile Fitting across the Wide, Deep, and Extreme Fields
Mock CSST images yield 95% completeness limits of 26.3-28.5 mag for point sources and 24.4-27.1 mag for galaxies, with fainter objects showing systematic overestimates in magnitude, size, and surface brightness and un...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.