Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Complexity of Drawing Graphs on Few Lines and Few Planes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.06444 v4 pith:5V23FZZJ submitted 2016-07-21 cs.CC cs.CG

classification cs.CCcs.CG
keywords mathbbdrawinggraphmathrmcrossing-freedecidingexistsrespect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

It is well known that any graph admits a crossing-free straight-line drawing in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and that any planar graph admits the same even in $\mathbb{R}^2$. For a graph $G$ and $d \in \{2,3\}$, let $\rho^1_d(G)$ denote the smallest number of lines in $\mathbb{R}^d$ whose union contains a crossing-free straight-line drawing of $G$. For $d=2$, $G$ must be planar. Similarly, let $\rho^2_3(G)$ denote the smallest number of planes in $\mathbb{R}^3$ whose union contains a crossing-free straight-line drawing of $G$. We investigate the complexity of computing these three parameters and obtain the following hardness and algorithmic results. - For $d\in\{2,3\}$, we prove that deciding whether $\rho^1_d(G)\le k$ for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$ is ${\exists\mathbb{R}}$-complete. - Since $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq{\exists\mathbb{R}}$, deciding $\rho^1_d(G)\le k$ is NP-hard for $d\in\{2,3\}$. On the positive side, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$. - Since ${\exists\mathbb{R}}\subseteq\mathrm{PSPACE}$, both $\rho^1_2(G)$ and $\rho^1_3(G)$ are computable in polynomial space. On the negative side, we show that drawings that are optimal with respect to $\rho^1_2$ or $\rho^1_3$ sometimes require irrational coordinates. - We prove that deciding whether $\rho^2_3(G)\le k$ is NP-hard for any fixed $k \ge 2$. Hence, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$ unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Line and Plane Cover Numbers Revisited

    cs.CG 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    It is NP-hard to decide whether a planar graph can be drawn with all vertices on two straight lines, and any graph drawable on two planes has at most 5n minus 19 edges.

  2. Optimal Curve Straightening is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-Complete

    cs.CG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimal curve straightening to a target vertex count is ∃R-complete, and isotopy realization spaces of curves are universal up to homotopy equivalence.

  3. Variants of the Segment Number of a Graph

    cs.CG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    All four variants of the segment number are ∃R-complete to decide, and there exist planar graphs where the classical segment number is asymptotically twice the 3D, bend, or crossing variant.

Pith tools