REVIEW 2 cited by
Non-perturbative determination of improvement coefficients using coordinate space correlators in $N_f=2+1$ lattice QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We determine quark mass dependent order $a$ improvement terms of the form $b_Jam$ for non-singlet scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axialvector currents using correlators in coordinate space on a set of CLS ensembles. These have been generated employing non-perturbatively improved Wilson Fermions and the tree-level L\"uscher-Weisz gauge action at $\beta = 3.4, 3.46, 3.55$ and $3.7$, corresponding to lattice spacings ranging from $a \approx 0.085$ fm down to $0.05$ fm. In the $N_f=2+1$ flavour theory two types of improvement coefficients exist: $b_J$, proportional to non-singlet quark mass combinations, and $\bar{b}_J$ (or $\tilde{b}_J$), proportional to the trace of the quark mass matrix. Combining our non-perturbative determinations with perturbative results, we quote Pad\'e approximants parameterizing the $b_J$ improvement coefficients within the above window of lattice spacings. We also give preliminary results for $\tilde{b}_J$ at $\beta=3.4$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Precision renormalisation and improvement of $N_{\rm f}=3$ lattice QCD with Wilson fermions
New non-perturbative renormalization and improvement results for currents and masses in Nf=3 O(a)-improved Wilson QCD at small a using Schrödinger functional boundary conditions and gradient flow tuning.
-
The isoscalar non-singlet axial form factor of the nucleon from lattice QCD
This lattice QCD proceedings paper presents a stable analysis strategy and preliminary results for the isoscalar non-singlet axial form factor of the nucleon, with the full u+d-2s case on two ensembles.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.