Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Role of Star-Formation and AGN in Dust Heating of z=0.3-2.8 Galaxies - II. Informing IR AGN fraction estimates through simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1609.08660 v2 pith:NIPJUKVL submitted 2016-09-27 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords fractionsimulationsempiricalestimatesfractionsgalaxiesdustcontribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A key question in extragalactic studies is the determination of the relative roles of stars and AGN in powering dusty galaxies at $z\sim$1-3 where the bulk of star-formation and AGN activity took place. In Paper I, we present a sample of $336$ 24$\mu$m-selected (Ultra)Luminous Infrared Galaxies, (U)LIRGs, at $z \sim 0.3$-$2.8$, where we focus on determining the AGN contribution to the IR luminosity. Here, we use hydrodynamic simulations with dust radiative transfer of isolated and merging galaxies, to investigate how well the simulations reproduce our empirical IR AGN fraction estimates and determine how IR AGN fractions relate to the UV-mm AGN fraction. We find that: 1) IR AGN fraction estimates based on simulations are in qualitative agreement with the empirical values when host reprocessing of the AGN light is considered; 2) for star-forming galaxy-AGN composites our empirical methods may be underestimating the role of AGN, as our simulations imply $>$50% AGN fractions, $\sim$3$\times$ higher than previous estimates; 3) 6% of our empirically classified "SFG" have AGN fractions $\gtrsim$50%. While this is a small percentage of SFGs, if confirmed, would imply the true number density of AGN may be underestimated; 4) this comparison depends on the adopted AGN template -- those that neglect the contribution of warm dust lower the empirical fractions by up to 2$\times$; and 5) the IR AGN fraction is only a good proxy for the intrinsic UV-mm AGN fraction when the extinction is high ($A_V\gtrsim 1$ or up to and including coalescence in a merger).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools