REVIEW 1 cited by
Blow-up lemmas for sparse graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The blow-up lemma states that a system of super-regular pairs contains all bounded degree spanning graphs as subgraphs that embed into a corresponding system of complete pairs. This lemma has far-reaching applications in extremal combinatorics. We prove sparse analogues of the blow-up lemma for subgraphs of random and of pseudorandom graphs. Our main results are the following three sparse versions of the blow-up lemma: one for embedding spanning graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$ in subgraphs of $G(n,p)$ with $p=C(\log n/n)^{1/\Delta}$; one for embedding spanning graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$ and degeneracy $D$ in subgraphs of $G(n,p)$ with $p=C_\Delta\big(\log n/n\big)^{1/(2D+1)}$; and one for embedding spanning graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$ in $(p,cp^{\max(4,(3\Delta+1)/2)}n)$-bijumbled graphs. We also consider various applications of these lemmas.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Robustness of the Sauer-Spencer Theorem
A random subgraph of a graph with minimum degree at least (1 - 1/(2Δ))n contains, with high probability, any spanning n-vertex graph of maximum degree Δ, once edges are kept with probability at least C n^{-1/m1(H)} log n.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.