REVIEW 1 cited by
Cross-correlation of galaxies and galaxy clusters in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the importance of non-Poissonian shot noise
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present measurements of angular cross power spectra between galaxies and optically-selected galaxy clusters in the final photometric sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We measure the auto- and cross-correlations between galaxy and cluster samples, from which we extract the effective biases and study the shot noise properties. We model the non-Poissonian shot noise by introducing an effective number density of tracers and fit for this quantity. We find that we can only describe the cross-correlation of galaxies and galaxy clusters, as well as the auto-correlation of galaxy clusters, on the relevant scales using a non-Poissonian shot noise contribution. The values of effective bias we finally measure for a volume-limited sample are $b_{cc}=4.09 \pm 0.47$ for the cluster auto-correlation and $b_{gc}=2.15 \pm 0.09$ for the galaxy-cluster cross-correlation. We find that these results are consistent with expectations from the auto-correlations of galaxies and clusters and are in good agreement with previous studies. The main result is two-fold: firstly we provide a measurement of the cross-correlation of galaxies and clusters, which can be used for further cosmological analysis, and secondly we describe an effective treatment of the shot noise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Measurement of Parity-Violating Modes of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Year 1 Luminous Red Galaxies' 4-Point Correlation Function
DESI's first parity-violation search shows a strong auto-correlation signal that disappears when the sky is split into patches, pointing to underestimated mocks' variance rather than new physics.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.