Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Functions on Antipower Prefix Lengths of the Thue-Morse Word

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.06310 v3 pith:FINGO7VY submitted 2017-05-17 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords gammaantipowerwordboundslengthprefixconjecturedefant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We say that a word $w$ of length $kn$ is a $k$-\textit{antipower} if it can be written in the form $w_1 \cdots w_k$, where each $w_i$ is a distinct word of length $n$. We analyze prefixes of the Thue-Morse word $\textbf{t}$ and lengths of antipowers occurring in them. Define $\Gamma(k)$ to be the largest odd $n$ such that the prefix of $\textbf{t}$ of length $kn$ is not a $k$-antipower, and $\gamma(k)$ to be the smallest odd $n$ such that the corresponding prefix is a $k$-antipower. We provide strong bounds on the asymptotic values of $\gamma(k)$ and $\Gamma(k)-\gamma(k)$. Our bounds on $\gamma(k)$ affirmatively answer one conjecture of Defant and make substantial progress towards answering a second conjecture of Defant. It was previously known that $\Gamma(k)$ and $\gamma(k)$ grow linearly in $k$, but our bounds on $\Gamma(k)-\gamma(k)$ prove that $\Gamma(k)-\gamma(k)$ also grows linearly in $k$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the cyclic regularities of strings

    cs.DS 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper defines cyclic periodicity and cyclic covers and claims efficient algorithms, but the proofs are inadequate and one central test appears to reject a valid cyclic periodic string.

Pith tools