Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Testing non-minimally coupled inflation with CMB data: a Bayesian analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.08877 v2 pith:VTWVGLPS submitted 2017-05-24 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords analysisdatabayesiancoupledcouplingfieldinflationarymodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We use the most recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) data to perform a Bayesian statistical analysis and discuss the observational viability of inflationary models with a non-minimal coupling,~$\xi$, between the inflaton field and the Ricci scalar. We particularize our analysis to two examples of small and large field inflationary models, namely, the Coleman-Weinberg and the chaotic quartic potentials. We find that (i) the $\xi$ parameter is closely correlated with the primordial amplitude; (ii) although improving the agreement with the CMB data in the $r - n_s$ plane, where $r$ is the tensor-to-scalar ratio and $n_s$ the primordial spectral index, a non-null coupling is strongly disfavoured with respect to the minimally coupled standard $\Lambda$CDM model, since the upper bounds of the Bayes factor (odds) for $\xi$ parameter are greater than $150:1$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The effective phase space and $e$-folding of the Starobinsky and extended Starobinsky model of inflation

    gr-qc 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under the Remmen-Carroll measure, the expected total e-folds for Starobinsky inflation are only about 3.5 to 4 for observationally allowed field values.

Pith tools