Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deterministic Partially Dynamic Single Source Shortest Paths in Weighted Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.10097 v1 pith:6W4YXCXA submitted 2017-05-29 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords algorithmtimetotalupdategraphsproblemshortestapproximate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In this paper we consider the decremental single-source shortest paths (SSSP) problem, where given a graph $G$ and a source node $s$ the goal is to maintain shortest distances between $s$ and all other nodes in $G$ under a sequence of online adversarial edge deletions. In their seminal work, Even and Shiloach [JACM 1981] presented an exact solution to the problem in unweighted graphs with only $O(mn)$ total update time over all edge deletions. Their classic algorithm was the state of the art for the decremental SSSP problem for three decades, even when approximate shortest paths are allowed. A series of results showed how to improve upon $O(mn)$ if approximation is allowed, culminating in a recent breakthrough of Henzinger, Krinninger and Nanongkai [FOCS 14], who presented a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate algorithm for undirected weighted graphs whose total update time is near linear: $O(m^{1+o(1)}\log(W))$, where $W$ is the ratio of the heaviest to the lightest edge weight in the graph. In this paper they posed as a major open problem the question of derandomizing their result. Until very recently, all known improvements over the Even-Shiloach algorithm were randomized and required the assumption of a non-adaptive adversary. In STOC 2016, Bernstein and Chechik showed the first \emph{deterministic} algorithm to go beyond $O(mn)$ total update time: the algorithm is also $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate, and has total update time $\tilde{O}(n^2)$. In SODA 2017, the same authors presented an algorithm with total update time $\tilde{O}(mn^{3/4})$. However, both algorithms are restricted to undirected, unweighted graphs. We present the \emph{first} deterministic algorithm for \emph{weighted} undirected graphs to go beyond the $O(mn)$ bound. The total update time is $\tilde{O}(n^2 \log(W))$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is Randomness Necessary for Adaptive Data Analysis?

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    In the random oracle model, deterministic ADA mechanisms fail after ~O(n) adaptive queries against unbounded analysts, proving randomness is strictly necessary.

  2. Deterministic Dynamic Maximal Matching in Sublinear Update Time

    cs.DS 2025-04 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    A fully dynamic maximal matching can be maintained deterministically in O~(n^(8/9)) amortized update time, the first sublinear deterministic bound.

Pith tools