pith. sign in

arxiv: 1706.10046 · v1 · pith:AK7CMGNCnew · submitted 2017-06-30 · 💻 cs.CC · cs.CG

Hamiltonicity is Hard in Thin or Polygonal Grid Graphs, but Easy in Thin Polygonal Grid Graphs

classification 💻 cs.CC cs.CG
keywords gridgraphspolygonalthinhamiltonicitycombinationshexagonalsquare
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In 2007, Arkin et al. initiated a systematic study of the complexity of the Hamiltonian cycle problem on square, triangular, or hexagonal grid graphs, restricted to polygonal, thin, superthin, degree-bounded, or solid grid graphs. They solved many combinations of these problems, proving them either polynomially solvable or NP-complete, but left three combinations open. In this paper, we prove two of these unsolved combinations to be NP-complete: Hamiltonicity of Square Polygonal Grid Graphs and Hamiltonicity of Hexagonal Thin Grid Graphs. We also consider a new restriction, where the grid graph is both thin and polygonal, and prove that Hamiltonicity then becomes polynomially solvable for square, triangular, and hexagonal grid graphs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ASP-Completeness of Hamiltonicity in Grid Graphs, with Applications to Loop Puzzles

    cs.CC 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Hamiltonicity in max-degree-3 grid graphs is ASP-complete, enabling a T-metacell framework that proves ASP-completeness for 38 loop puzzles, 14 previously unknown to be NP-hard.