Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Behavioral Communities and the Atomic Structure of Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.04656 v6 pith:QFBB7A7U submitted 2017-10-12 physics.soc-ph cs.SI

classification physics.soc-phcs.SI
keywords atomsnetworkbehaviorsadoptbehaviorbehavioralcommunitiesdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

When people prefer to coordinate their behaviors with their friends -- e.g., choosing whether to adopt a new technology, to protest against a government, to attend university -- divisions within a social network can sustain different behaviors in different parts of the network. We define a society's `behavioral communities' via its network's `atoms': groups of people who adopt the same behavior in every equilibrium. We analyze how the atoms change with the intensity of the peer effects, and characterize the atoms in a prominent class of network models. We show that using knowledge of atoms to seed the diffusion of a behavior significantly increases diffusion compared to seeding based on standard community detection algorithms. We also show how to use observed behaviors to estimate the intensity of peer effects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymmetric Network Games: $\alpha$-Potential Function and Learning

    cs.GT 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract claims α-potential analysis of asymmetric network games, with 2α-Nash convergence guarantees for two algorithms and α controlled by network asymmetry; the attached full text is an unrelated paper, so veri...

  2. Inequality's Economic and Social Roots: the Role of Social Networks and Homophily

    econ.GN 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    An invited review synthesizing evidence that homophilous networks channel jobs, information, and norms, thereby perpetuating inequality and immobility.

Pith tools