pith. sign in

arxiv: 1711.08037 · v2 · pith:YX55YGVAnew · submitted 2017-11-20 · 📊 stat.ML

The Doctor Just Won't Accept That!

classification 📊 stat.ML
keywords acceptlearningmachinestakeholderswhatfieldinterpretablejust
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Calls to arms to build interpretable models express a well-founded discomfort with machine learning. Should a software agent that does not even know what a loan is decide who qualifies for one? Indeed, we ought to be cautious about injecting machine learning (or anything else, for that matter) into applications where there may be a significant risk of causing social harm. However, claims that stakeholders "just won't accept that!" do not provide a sufficient foundation for a proposed field of study. For the field of interpretable machine learning to advance, we must ask the following questions: What precisely won't various stakeholders accept? What do they want? Are these desiderata reasonable? Are they feasible? In order to answer these questions, we'll have to give real-world problems and their respective stakeholders greater consideration.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligence

    cs.CY 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Advanced AI systems are unexplainable in full and produce explanations that humans cannot comprehend.