Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Semantics of Intensionality and Intensional Recursion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.09302 v1 pith:5UMKQMGM submitted 2017-12-26 cs.LO cs.PLmath.CTmath.LO

classification cs.LOcs.PLmath.CTmath.LO
keywords intensionalrecursionintensionalityextensionallyintensionallyphenomenonabilityabstract
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Intensionality is a phenomenon that occurs in logic and computation. In the most general sense, a function is intensional if it operates at a level finer than (extensional) equality. This is a familiar setting for computer scientists, who often study different programs or processes that are interchangeable, i.e. extensionally equal, even though they are not implemented in the same way, so intensionally distinct. Concomitant with intensionality is the phenomenon of intensional recursion, which refers to the ability of a program to have access to its own code. In computability theory, intensional recursion is enabled by Kleene's Second Recursion Theorem. This thesis is concerned with the crafting of a logical toolkit through which these phenomena can be studied. Our main contribution is a framework in which mathematical and computational constructions can be considered either extensionally, i.e. as abstract values, or intensionally, i.e. as fine-grained descriptions of their construction. Once this is achieved, it may be used to analyse intensional recursion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The gate of self-address: where decidable adjudication ends

    math.LO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single self-referential query gate makes total correct adjudication impossible; bounding the depth keeps every finite level decidable, and full adjudication costs exactly one Turing jump.

  2. G\"odel coding on fibrations and geminal categories

    math.LO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Defines code structures on fibrations to simplify the proof of Löb's theorem in geminal categories and adds a new categorical version of the Gödel-Löb axiom.

Pith tools