Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Burgess bound via a trivial delta method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.00542 v2 pith:HT6N7QRW submitted 2018-03-01 math.NT

classification math.NT
keywords boundvarepsilonburgessburgess-typedeltamethodotimestrivial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Let $g$ be a fixed Hecke cusp form for $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ and $\chi$ be a primitive Dirichlet character of conductor $M$. The best known subconvex bound for $L(1/2,g\otimes \chi)$ is of Burgess strength. The bound was proved by a couple of methods: shifted convolution sums and the Petersson/Kuznetsov formula analysis. It is natural to ask what inputs are really needed to prove a Burgess-type bound on $\rm GL(2)$. In this paper, we give a new proof of the Burgess-type bounds ${L(1/2,g\otimes \chi)\ll_{g,\varepsilon} M^{1/2-1/8+\varepsilon}}$ and $L(1/2,\chi)\ll_{\varepsilon} M^{1/4-1/16+\varepsilon}$ that does not require the basic tools of the previous proofs and instead uses a trivial delta method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Squarefree numbers in short intervals: explicit and formalized

    math.NT 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For intervals of length H = X^{1/5 - 2/90935 + ε}, the number of squarefree integers differs from (6/π²)H by at most an explicit constant times H X^{-ε/10^{25}}.

Pith tools