Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interplay of Simple and Selfadjoint-Ideal Semigroups in B(H)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.01272 v2 pith:3DMA3CNS submitted 2018-06-04 math.FA math.OA

classification math.FAmath.OA
keywords semigroupssimplewhenoperatorrankcasecharacterizationequivalent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates a question of Radjavi: Which multiplicative semigroups in B(H) have all their ideals selfadjoint (called herein selfadjoint-ideal (SI) semigroups)? We proved this property is a unitary invariant for B(H)-semigroups, which invariant we believe is new. We characterize those SI semigroups S singly generated by T, for T a normal operator and for T a rank one operator. When T is nonselfadjoint and normal or rank one: S is an SI semigroup if and only if it is simple, except in one special rank one partial isometry case when our characterization yields S that are SI but not simple. So SI and simplicity are not equivalent notions. When T is selfadjoint, it is straightforward to see that S is always an SI semigroup, but we prove by examples they may or may not be simple, but for this case we do not have a characterization. The study of SI semigroups involves solving certain operator equations in the semigroups. A central theme of this paper is to study when and when not SI is equivalent to simple.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools