REVIEW 3 cited by
Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A search for a narrow-width resonance decaying into two Higgs bosons, each decaying into a bottom quark-antiquark pair, is presented. The search is performed using proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC. No evidence for such a signal is observed. Upper limits are set on the product of the production cross section for the resonance and the branching fraction for the selected decay mode in the resonance mass range from 260 to 1200 GeV.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Model-agnostic search for dijet resonances with anomalous jet substructure in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV
A model-agnostic CMS search for dijet resonances with anomalous jet substructure finds no excess and reports first exclusion limits on several benchmark signals, with ML anomaly detection improving sensitivity over in...
-
Light scalars within the $\mathcal{CP}$-conserving Aligned-two-Higgs-doublet model
All seven light-scalar scenarios of the CP-conserving aligned two-Higgs-doublet model contain sizeable parameter regions compatible with current collider and flavour data, with the lightest new scalars bounded by LEP ...
-
Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios
The two-real-singlet extension of the Standard Model can produce sizable rates for asymmetric and cascade Higgs-to-Higgs decays at the LHC, and the paper supplies six benchmark planes for those signatures.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.